Household pilot
Tests appliance-style setup, pairing, local dashboard, status comprehension, recovery, support export, and ordinary usability.
Pilot Program
RelayHub pilots exist to test local-first communication, onboarding, recovery, trust, documentation, hardware classes, support boundaries, accessibility, and real community usefulness before anything is treated as broadly supported.
Pilot purpose
A RelayHub pilot is a bounded learning activity. It should prove what works, reveal what fails, capture evidence, test recovery, improve documentation, and prevent unsupported claims from becoming product promises.
Pilot types
A good pilot is small, observable, recoverable, documented, and honest about what is being tested.
Tests appliance-style setup, pairing, local dashboard, status comprehension, recovery, support export, and ordinary usability.
Tests local-first communication, trust, documentation, recovery, coordination, community roles, and practical group workflows.
Tests hardware classes, boot behaviour, storage, power, thermal behaviour, Reticulum operation, and recovery paths.
Tests degraded operation, intermittent connectivity, local-only workflows, portability, support expectations, and real-world constraints.
Tests workshop material, onboarding guides, recovery cards, status explanations, and non-technical learning paths.
Tests RelayOS concepts, future APIs, validation tooling, documentation, integration boundaries, and implementation assumptions.
Pilot phases
RelayHub pilots should move through clear phases so participants know what is happening, what evidence matters, and what happens next.
Collect participant details, location, use case, hardware, technical comfort, and expected value.
Define what will be tested, what will not be tested, who participates, what hardware is used, and what safety limits apply.
Prepare guides, recovery instructions, status cards, test checklists, support process, and evidence capture templates.
Test setup, local-only operation, trust, recovery, support export, documentation, degraded states, and participant comprehension.
Analyse evidence, issues, failures, confusion, risks, support burden, recovery results, and readiness for the next step.
Continue, revise, expand, pause, stop, or return to lab validation based on evidence rather than enthusiasm.
Evidence
If a pilot produces no evidence, it cannot safely guide the product. Evidence may be public, private, redacted, or internal depending on the people, risks, privacy, and deployment context.
What pilots test
A RelayHub pilot should prove whether real people can understand setup, status, trust, recovery, support, hardware limits, and product boundaries.
Success and failure
The purpose of a pilot is not to prove RelayHub is ready. The purpose is to find the truth early enough to improve the system safely.
The tested flow works, users understand it, recovery is available, risks are acceptable, and evidence supports progression.
The core idea works, but usability, documentation, recovery, hardware, or support needs revision before expansion.
The test exposes serious technical, recovery, usability, safety, or trust problems that must be fixed before another pilot.
The pilot should stop if participants may rely on unsupported behaviour, misunderstand risk, or exceed safe boundaries.
The concept remains useful, but the flow, hardware, documentation, policy, or support process must be redesigned.
The test should move back to controlled validation if field conditions reveal unresolved architecture or recovery issues.
Safety boundaries
A pilot is a learning and validation activity. It should not be marketed as a supported release, certified deployment, emergency service, privacy guarantee, or replacement for critical communication.
A pilot is not a product-supported release.
A pilot must not be used as an emergency-service guarantee.
Experimental hardware must be labelled experimental.
Recovery must be tested before expansion.
Support boundaries must be clear before participants rely on the system.
RelayHub must not be described as providing perfect anonymity.
Radio transmit must not be assumed lawful merely because hardware exists.
No participant should depend on RelayHub as their only communication path during a pilot.
A pilot may stop safely if the system is not ready.
Who should apply?
The best early participants understand that pilots are about learning, validation, feedback, recovery, and safe improvement — not polished product promises.
Current limitations
RelayHub is currently collecting interest and preparing public foundations. Product builds, hardware certification, validation runs, and formal pilots come later.
Apply for a future pilot
RelayHub is looking for practical interest from households, communities, builders, developers, educators, and organisations that understand the difference between a pilot and a supported product.